Open science and university
Abstract
Open science is one of the paradigms about its dissemination. At the same time, universities are the organizations called to preserve, produce and disseminate scientific productions nowadays. This article proposes a system of actions to implement the principles of open science in universities. First of all, a position is taken on the fundamental principles of open science and its advantages, as well as the challenges and prospects. Finally, the system is organized into six fundamental activities, each with its supporting activities.
Downloads
References
Casimo, K. (2023). Teaching and training with open science: From classroom teaching tool to professional development. Neuroscience, 525, 6-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.07.013
Collins, G. S., Whittle, R., Bullock, G. S., Logullo, P., Dhiman, P., de Beyer, J. A., Riley, R. D. y Schlussel, M. M. (2024). Open science practices need substantial improvement in prognostic model studies in oncology using machine learning. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 165, Artículo 111199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.015
Dumanis, S. B., Ratan, K., McIntosh, S., Shah, H. V., Lewis, M., Vines, T. H., Schekman, R. y Riley, E. A. (2023). From policy to practice: Lessons learned from an open science funding initiative. PLoS Computational Biology, 19(12), e1011626. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011626
Hanke, M., Pestilli, F., Wagner, A. S., Markiewicz, C. J., Poline, J.-B. y Halchenko, Y. O. (2021). In defense of decentralized research data management. Neuroforum, 27(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1515/nf-2020-0037
Kondo, Y., Miyata, A., Ikeuchi, U., Nakahara, S., Nakashima, K., Ōnishi, H., Osawa, T., Ota, K., Sato, K., Ushijima, K., Baptista, B. V., Kumazawa, T., Hayashi, K., Murayama, Y., Okuda, N. y Nakanishi, H. (2019). Interlinking open science and community-based participatory research for socio-environmental issues. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 54-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.07.001
Krishna, V. V. (2020). Open science and its enemies: challenges for a sustainable science–society social contract. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030061
Lázaro-Rodríguez, P. (2023). Sobre el código abierto en la ciencia abierta: ¿es ciencia abierta si se ha escrito, desarrollado o procesado con software propietario? Anuario ThinkEPI, 17. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2023.e17a12
Ratan, K., Dumanis, S. B., McIntosh, S., Shah, H. V., Lewis, M., Vines, T. H., Schekman, R. y Riley, E. A. (2023). From policy to practice: Tracking an open science funding initiative. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.27.530238
Sanabria-Z, J., Cruz-Sandoval, M., Moreno-Romo, A., Bosch-Gómez, S. y Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2024). Research foresight in bridging open science and open innovation: Overview based on the complex thinking paradigm. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 8(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2023.08.002
Scheibein, F., Donnelly, W. y Wells, J. S. (2022). Assessing open science and citizen science in addictions and substance use research: A scoping review. International Journal of Drug Policy, 100, Artículo 103505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103505
Schöpfel, J., Azeroual, O. y de-Castro, P. (2022). Research information systems and ethics relating to open science. Procedia Computer Science, 211, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.174
Vicente-Saez, R., Gustafsson, R. y Van-den-Brande, L. (2020). The dawn of an open exploration era: Emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120037
